People and Power: Electricity Sector Reforms and the Poor in Europe and Central Asia, Pagina 419World Bank, 2007 - 227 pagini The debate on how to conduct pro-poor reforms of utilities frequently condemns tariff-based subsidies as socially regressive. But the empirical insights on household behavior and electricity consumption patterns in this book reveal that, in ECA, where access to utilities is almost universal, the erosion of tariff based subsidies has disproportionately affected the poor, while direct transfers through social benefit systems have often been inadequately targeted. The book suggests alternative strategies for achieving cost-recovery in the electricity sector in a socially and politically acceptable manner, providing lessons that are equally relevant for other utilities and regions. |
Din interiorul cărții
Rezultatele 1 - 3 din 94
Pagina 49
... Poor households are typically larger than nonpoor households , so per capita expenditure gives different results . included natural gas and central heat . Rural households depended more on wood for heating than urban households . In ...
... Poor households are typically larger than nonpoor households , so per capita expenditure gives different results . included natural gas and central heat . Rural households depended more on wood for heating than urban households . In ...
Pagina 55
... households responded more strongly to the price change , lowering their ... households ( 26 percent ) than urban ( 13 percent ) , probably because rural ... Poor ? 55 Effects on the Poor and Nonpoor Effect on Bill Amounts and Payments.
... households responded more strongly to the price change , lowering their ... households ( 26 percent ) than urban ( 13 percent ) , probably because rural ... Poor ? 55 Effects on the Poor and Nonpoor Effect on Bill Amounts and Payments.
Pagina 57
... family benefit was indeed going to the poorest households.9 But it was possible to examine whether poor households and households regularly consuming in the lower blocks of the 1998 tariff structure reported receiving the transfer . Poor ...
... family benefit was indeed going to the poorest households.9 But it was possible to examine whether poor households and households regularly consuming in the lower blocks of the 1998 tariff structure reported receiving the transfer . Poor ...
Alte ediții - Afișează-le pe toate
Termeni și expresii frecvente
AES Telasi Albania analysis Armenia arrears average Azerbaijan Baku Barmek Belarus benefits bills Bulgaria central heat collection rates consumers cost recovery countries demand distribution companies district heating dram economic effects of reform efficiency electricity consumption electricity expenditures electricity sector energy consumption energy expenditures energy sector environmental Europe and Central figure focus group Georgia higher Household Budget Survey Households reported impact of reform improved infrastructure investments Kazakhstan kerosene kgoe Kyrgyz Republic Lampietti manat meters mitigating Moldova natural gas nonpayment NREDs payment percent of households percentage political poor and nonpoor poor households Poor Nonpoor poverty power sector price elasticity price increases privatization PSIAS region residential Romania rural sector reform Serbia service quality share social Source stakeholders substitutes supply Table Tajikistan targeted tariff increases tariff-based subsidies Tbilisi Total Bottom 20 traditional fuels tricity Ukraine Union Fenosa utility welfare losses wood World Bank Yerevan